Posts categorized "Manbearpig"

August 07, 2008

It's Not Cool Being Green in the UK

Looks like the Brits have jilted AlGore. 

What would Kermit think of this article today in the Times of London?

Suddenly being green is not cool any more

As the credit crunch bites, environmental policies are being ditched. But oddly we are doing better at saving the planet

Julie Burchill can't stand them. According to her new book, Not in my Name: A Compendium of Modern Hypocrisy, she thinks all environmentalists are po-faced, unsexy, public school alumni who drivel on about the end of the world because they don't want the working classes to have any fun, go on foreign holidays or buy cheap clothes.

Michael O'Leary, the chief executive of Ryanair, agrees. In an interview with Rachel Sylvester and me, he told us that the “nutbag ecologists” are the overindulged rich who have nothing better to do with their lives than talk about hot air and beans.

So the salad days are over; it's the end of the greens. Where only a year ago the smart new eco-warriors were revered, wormeries and unbleached cashmere jeans are now seen as a middle-class indulgence.

But the problem for the green lobby isn't that it has been overrun by “toffs”: it's the chilly economic climate that has frozen the shoots of environmentalism. Espousing the green life, with its misshapen vegetables and non-disposable nappies, is increasingly being seen as a luxury by everyone.

Only a year ago, according to MORI, 15 per cent of those polled put the environment in their top three concerns. That figure has dropped by a third to 10 per cent this month. Now that people are fighting for their own survival rather than their grandchildren's, they put crime, the economy and rising prices at the top of their list.

According to Andrew Cooper, director of the research company, Populus: “There is a direct correlation between how people perceive the economy and the importance they place on the environment. When times are tough people resent paying more to salve their conscience.” This means that fewer people are now buying organic chickens from smart supermarkets when they can pay £3.99 at Lidl. With all food prices rising, the organic market is being credit-crunched. Demand for it grew by 70 per cent from 2002 to 2007; now it has stalled, according to the consultancy Organic Monitor.

The vast new organic Whole Foods Store on Kensington High Street in London is so quiet you can hear the cheese breathe in the specially designed glass room. Meanwhile the demand for takeaway pizzas and McDonald's has risen as people find the cheapest way to eat.

When David Cameron became leader of the Conservative Party he said that green issues were at the top of his agenda. His slogan for the local elections last year was “Vote Blue, Go Green”. But in the past few months he has realised that voters have lost the appetite for their greens.

He has only given one environmental speech since Christmas. Once he used to talk about putting a £3,000 windmill on top of his house. Now the message is not about conserving the planet but preserving his bank balance. He wears catalogue clothes, grows his own vegetables and holidays barefoot in Britain because it is less extravagant, not because he is trying to reduce his global footprint.

In fact, when the Tory leader's bicycle was stolen a week ago, the message of the story was not how green he was for riding his bike, but how broken our society has become when a politician finds his bike nicked from under his nose.

Boris Johnson was the first to realise that the tolerance for green taxes may have peaked. When he became Mayor of London, he dropped plans to charge a £25 congestion fee on gas-guzzling cars.

The Tories have quietly been reviewing many of their green policies. A range of measures designed to penalise motoring and other polluting activities has been put on hold in case they alienate families struggling to pay their bills. A proposal to tax the highest emitting cars up to £500 more than the greenest vehicles has been quietly shelved, as has the plan to raise taxes on short-haul flights. Instead George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, has promised to cut tax on fuel when oil prices rise.

Gordon Brown has also stopped discussing his solar panels and compost heap in Scotland and is trying to dissociate himself from local council rubbish taxes - even though they have been driven by central government plans to put up landfill charges.

Both parties are looking at ways of rewarding people for being green rather than penalising them for throwing out their yoghurt pots with their teabags. Mr Osborne, in a speech last month, admitted: “When people are feeling the pinch, we need to make it pay to go green. Instead of being fined for not recycling, households should be paid for recycling.”

When Barack Obama first decided to run for the presidency, he embraced the green cause. Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth, about global warming had just become the biggest grossing documentary in history and Mr Gore had won the Nobel prize. But recently Mr Obama has been talking more about thrift than trees. Instead of showing off his recycling skills, he explains that his children don't receive Christmas or birthday presents.

It's not just the economic downturn that has harmed the green order. People have become wary of environmental causes that can turn out to do more harm than good. They don't want wind turbines marching across Britain's moors when nuclear power stations can do more to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. They worry that washing and bleaching all those non-disposable nappies may be damaging the ozone layer, that the massive incentives for biofuels have distorted the world food market, and that green taxes are actually stealth taxes.

But paradoxically, just as Britain is turning its back on the environment, the country is finally becoming greener. Fewer people are moving house so they are buying fewer new white goods such as washing machines and fridges. They may not be queueing up for £9 organic Poilâne bread, but for the first time in a decade they are discarding less food. They buy less impulsively and think more carefully before their weekly shop. Children are wearing hand-me-down uniforms rather than new ones made in sweatshops.

Bottled water sales have fallen. Garden centres have reported a 10 per cent rise in the sales of vegetable seeds in the past 12 months. People are saving money by growing their own potatoes and carrots. They are turning off their central heating for a few more months of the year and ditching their second car rather than buying an electric runaround. And instead of carbon-offsetting their holidays, they are simply going on fewer of them.

It's the downturn that has made greenery look unappetising - but it may yet prove to do more than anything to save the planet.

- - - - - - - - - - -

Source:  http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article4474202.ece

Julia

The Envoronmentalists are coming

Yes,they are coming to my home town for a Forum on Manbearpig (Global Warming). You can go and get badgered by a bunch of so-called experts on Climate tell you we are all going to die in 10 years again. I am sorry that I do not believe in this crap that has been foisted on us. All of the "Computer Models" done by any of these so-called experts have been completely wrong, and with the temperatures holding steady for the past 10 years, why are we even having these forums. Every day now we hear of more and more scientists that do not drink the cup of Mambearpig and do not think we are all going to die a fiery death due to the mythical creature.

Maybe I would start believing them if they can tell me what the temperature and precipitation is going to be next week or the Disciples of the Goracle and the Goracle himself would actually do what they preach.


Forums in metro-east address global warming



A free public forum on
global warming is scheduled for 6 to 7:30 p.m. Aug. 27 at the Southwestern
Illinois College PSOP Building, 201 N. Church St.

The town hall meeting will be part of the summer statewide Illinois Environmental Council-sponsored series that aims to convene local residents, elected officials and community groups to discuss how soaring gas prices, asthma rates and shifting gardening zones are related to climate change.

Another free public forum is scheduled for 6:30 p.m. Aug. 12 at the National Great Rivers Museum, 2 Lock and Dam Way in Alton.

"We face a host of problems related to global warming, but most people haven't made the connection," said Jonathan Goldman, executive director of the environmental council. "These public forums will help everyone better understand the links and how we can begin to change things with good legislation and prudent, long-term solutions."

Aur J. Beck, an energy efficiency and renewable energy installer, will speak at the Belleville meeting. He operates Advanced Energy Solutions in Carbondale and helped create the Illinois Renewable Energy Association and the Southern Illinois Center for a Sustainable Future.


Belleville News Democrat


July 22, 2008

The Wheels on the Manbearpig bus are coming apart

More from the "deniers" of Manbearpig.   Roy Spencer's great testimony to the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.  The Models and conclusions from Manbearpig theorists do not add up to actual observations.   

Testimony of Roy W. Spencer before the
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on 22 July 2008

A  printable PDF of this testimony can be found here

I would like to thank Senator Boxer and and members of the Committee for allowing me to discuss my experiences as a NASA employee engaged in global warming research, as well as to provide my current views on the state of the science of global warming and climate change.

I have a PhD in Meteorology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and have been involved in global warming research for close to twenty years. I have numerous peer reviewed scientific articles dealing with the measurement and interpretation of climate variability and climate change. I am also the U.S. Science Team Leader for the AMSR-E instrument flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite.

Read the whole testimony in the pdf.

July 17, 2008

Americans for Prosperity Crashes Al Gore's Speech

Do as I say not as I do.   Hypocrisy is the Goracle.

The return of the Goracle

Capt_lkw10502091350_aptopix_britain AlGore wants to get us cereal about Manbearpig again.  Even after about a decade of Global Cooling and gas prices rising because of the past 30 years or so of negilgence by CONgress not to get a handle on Energy Independence and the ingorance of not building more oil refineries. 

But have no fear, the Goracle is back and spouting out the same nonsense he always has done in the past.    He is gong to “press the reset button on how people are looking at the energy crisis and the climate crisis,” .  Well isn't that special.   He is going to rehash all the same BS he has said before.   I wonder is it going to be 10 years until we are doomed, or is it going to be some other arbitrary number???

At least some Republicans are talking agains thet Goracle, not our esteemed nominee McCain "I believe in GlobalWarming amd taxing the hell outofeveryone for it" McCain.

“Mr. Gore will yet again call attention to the policies called for by radical environmentalists that would result in even higher gas prices,” said Michael Steel, spokesman for House Republican Leader John Boehner (Ohio).---The Hill

Come on Republicans, get your heads on straight and use the energy crisis as a tool to win back the CONgress.   It is an issue that more people will be behind and the Republicans should use it for their advantage.   

July 15, 2008

Manbearpig now causes kidney stones

This is getting ridiculous.  Every ailment or problem anyone has is caused by Manbearpig now.   Some researchers have concluded that people will get more kidneystones now because of Manbearpig, even though we have been cooling for the past 10 yeas or so.  And they are cereal.

Manbearpig Global warming may increase kidney stones: researchers

More Americans are likely to suffer from kidney stones in the coming years as a result of global warming, according to researchers at the University of Texas.

Kidney stones, which are formed from dissolved minerals in the urine and can be extremely painful, are often caused by caused by dehydration, either by not drinking enough liquid or losing too much due to high heat conditions.

If global warming trends continue as projected by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2007, the United States can expect as much as a 30 percent growth in kidney stone disease in some of its driest areas, said the findings published in Monday's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The increased incidence of disease would represent between 1.6 million and 2.2 million cases by 2050, costing the US economy as much as one billion dollars in treatment costs.

"This study is one of the first examples of global warming causing a direct medical consequence for humans," said Margaret Pearle, professor of urology at University of Texas Southwestern and senior author of the paper. ---BREITBART.com

July 09, 2008

Global Warming Derangement

It has come to this.   The Doom and Gloom perveyors of Man Made Global Warming have made a teenager go insane in Australia.  Way you go AlGore, scaring littel kids and driving them nuts.  He thinks that he can not drink water because it will be scarce in the future and has dilusions of the apocolyps.   This is what happens when you try and scare people with dilusional images of Doom and Gloom to little children and say it is science.  This is getting out of hand.  The data does not validate the so-called experts oon Climatology's models of Man Made Global Warming.   the Antarctic has had the most amount of ice gain on record, the Arctic Ice has recovered and has gained in area since last year.  The temperatures have been steadily cooling since 1998.  Stop all of the Doom and Gloom, it is getting sickening to hear how the growing Ice in Montana is because of Global Warming.   I guess all the ice in the Antarctic is also because of Global Warming.

Manbearpig Doomed to a fatal delusion over climate change

PSYCHIATRISTS have detected the first case of "climate change delusion" - and they haven't even yet got to Kevin Rudd and his global warming guru.

Writing in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Joshua Wolf and Robert Salo of our Royal Children's Hospital say this delusion was a "previously unreported phenomenon".

"A 17-year-old man was referred to the inpatient psychiatric unit at Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne with an eight-month history of depressed mood . . . He also . . . had visions of apocalyptic events."

(So have Alarmist of the Year Tim Flannery, Profit of Doom Al Gore and Sir Richard Brazen, but I digress.)

"The patient had also developed the belief that, due to climate change, his own water consumption could lead within days to the deaths of millions of people through exhaustion of water supplies."

But never mind the poor boy, who became too terrified even to drink. What's scarier is that people in charge of our Government seem to suffer from this "climate change delusion", too.

Here is Prime Minister Kevin Rudd yesterday, with his own apocalyptic vision: "If we do not begin reducing the nation's levels of carbon pollution, Australia's economy will face more frequent and severe droughts, less water, reduced food production and devastation of areas such as the Great Barrier Reef and Kakadu wetlands."

And here is a senior Sydney Morning Herald journalist aghast at the horrors described in the report on global warming released on Friday by Rudd's guru, Professor Ross Garnaut: "Australians must pay more for petrol, food and energy or ultimately face a rising death toll . . ."

Wow. Pay more for food or die. Is that Rudd's next campaign slogan? --Herald Sun

June 24, 2008

We are all going to die #34,987,234,047,234

Yes we got 1year or we are all going to die in a great ball of fire, or drought that Hanson has predicted the Midwest  was going  to have over 20 years ago.  Geez, that came out to be true didn;t it???   So every stock up on food items because the end of the world is coming if Obamassih is not elected in Novemeber.  You heard it first from the KosKids.

Now on to our intrepid reporter PJ Comix

Manbearpig

"We have ONE year.. ONE election"

Remember all the propaganda we were fed about how Global Warming is a non-partisan issue? Well, it turns out it was all hogwash. No big surprise there. The Left is now enlisting Global Warming alarmism on a big scale to help get Barack Obama elected as you can see in this KOmmie THREAD titled, "Hansen on Global Warming: We have ONE year.. ONE election." Yes, me must elect Obama or it will be the END OF THE WORLD!!! It turns out that James Hansen has been making Global Warming alarmist WARNINGS for at least 20 years. In 1988 he predicted severe dought was coming to the midwest. Five years later, in 1993, the Midwest experienced extreme flooding. Also check out the current flooding in the Midwest to see just how accurate Hansen has been in his predictions. One might as well consult Jean Dixon in predicting climate change. However, the KOmmies turn to Hansen as some sort of prophet to help them elect their beloved Obama. So let us now watch the KOmmies play the Global Warming Alarmist card in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, noting that the weatherman is lucky if he can predict the weather correctly just 3 days in advance, is in the [barackets]:

Hansen on Global Warming: We have ONE year.. ONE election

[Or your KOmmie brains will fry.]

In 2006, the great climate scientist James Hansen famously said

[Something as "accurate" as his prediction about Midwest drought?]

"I think we have a very brief window of opportunity to deal with climate change ... no longer than a decade, at the most."

[He needs that same script for use in 2016.]

Since then, things have gotten much, much worse. The Arctic ice is melting faster than expected. CO2 emissions are accelerating. Global warming is accelerating.

[Don't forget about that drought in the Midwest.]

Hansen no longer stands by his estimate that we have one decade to turn things around. He now thinks that was too optimistic. Today, James Hansen told congress that we have one year.

[Translation: Elect Barack Obama or we all DIE!!!]

We have one year. One election.

[Elect Obama. Elect Obama. ELECT OBAMA!!!]

And simply winning is not enough.. we will need radical changes in policy.

[TRANSLATION: We need Global Warming as an excuse to institute socialism.]

And if we lose...

[You will be joining the Heavens Gate cult aboard the Mother Ship. And now to the rest of the KOmmies...]

Most coverage has focussed on his statement that oil CEOs should be prosecuted. This is interesting, but I think misses the point of his testimony.

[Thanx for that confirmation that Hansen is indeed a leftwing loon.]

It's time to stop Climaticide and that means working for justice as well as having the right policies. Without justice there will be cynicism and cynicism plays into the hands of the denialists and the tactics of disinformation.

[LOL! "Climaticide." I definitely have to file that word away with "Freudenschade."]

The warming of the Arctic is beginning to look irreversible. There are positive feedbacks that are amplifying inputs. Sea ice melting is causing more warming and more warm Atlantic water flowing into the Arctic.

[Gee! Then how is it that we can still watch Ice Road Truckers who drive right over the frozen Arctic ocean?]

Republican ideology will block any meaningful. Climate related reform into the foreseeable future. We all might as well accept extinction because nothing will change in the USA in terms of politics. The only conceivable circumstance that might avoid extinction of humanity is if the oil economy suffers catastrophic and irreversible loss. Which, given Republican Rapturist ideology, is always possible via warmongering, most likely Iran. Even the complete melting of Greenland won't stop the greed and selfishness of Republicans.

[EVIL Republicans!!! It's all their fault! So much for that hype about Global Warming being a non-partisan issue.]

He seems to be mixing a bunch of stuff. One moment, it is "99% certain." The next he's saying there will be 2-meter sea level rise this century, which is certanly not in IPCC projections.

[Don't stop Hansen. He's on a roll.]

Considering that we will not take power for 7 more months - we have a little problem here.

[Which will pale in comparison to the HUGE mental problem you will have in 7 months if you do NOT take power.]

Hansen's superlative reputation makes his increasingly edgy statements deeply disturbing.

[Yeah. I found his statements about Midwest drought deeply disturbing.] ---DUmmie FUnnies

May 22, 2008

The Grey Lady Gets It - ManBearPig is Hysteria

From National Review On-Line. 

Even The New York Review of Books Sees It   [Peter Wehner]

The current issue (June 12) of The New York Review of Books includes by Freeman Dyson, professor of physics emeritus at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. He reviews two books on global warming: A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies by William Nordhaus; and Global Warming: Looking Beyond Kyoto, edited by Ernesto Zedillo.

Professor Dyson, a renowned theoretical physicist and mathematician famous for his work in, among other things, quantum mechanics, believes in anthropogenic global warming. But he also believes that there is a dangerous tendency among an increasing number of advocates of global warming to be “dogmatic” and shut down the debate. In that context, the concluding three paragraphs of Dyson’s New York Review of Books essay are worth highlighting:

All the books that I have seen about the science and economics of global warming, including the two books under review, miss the main point.  The main point is religious rather than scientific.  There is a worldwide secular religion which we may call environmentalism, holding that we are stewards of the earth, that despoiling the planet with waste products of our luxurious living is a sin, and that the path of righteousness is to live as frugally as possible.  The ethics of environmentalism are being taught to children in kindergartens, schools, and colleges all over the world.

Environmentalism has replaced socialism as the leading secular religion.  And the ethics of environmentalism are fundamentally sound.  Scientists and economists can agree with Buddhist monks and Christian activists that ruthless destruction of natural habitats is evil and careful preservation of birds and butterflies is good. The worldwide community of environmentalists – most of whom are not scientists – holds the moral high ground, and is guiding human societies toward a hopeful future.  Environmentalism, as a religion of hope and respect for nature, is here to stay.  This is a religion that we can all share, whether or not we believe that global warming is harmful.

Unfortunately, some members of the environmental movement have also adopted as an article of faith the belief that global warming is the greatest threat to the ecology of our planet.  That is one reason why the arguments about global warming have become bitter and passionate.  Much of the public has come to believe that anyone who is skeptical about the dangers of global warming is an enemy of the environment.  The skeptics now have the difficult task of convincing the public that the opposite is true.  Many of the skeptics are passionate environmentalists.  They are horrified to see the obsession with global warming distracting public attention from what they see as more serious and more immediate dangers to the planet, including problems of nuclear weaponry, environmental degradation, and social injustice. Whether they turn out to be right or wrong, their arguments on these issues deserve to be heard. [emphasis added]

Source:  http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTJkZTYwODY5YzJmZTgyMDg5MDg2MDc5NzI3NDZmMzE=

Julia

May 19, 2008

Uh Oh. AL Gore has some splanin to do

Manbearpig Yes, of course we all know about the "consensus" over Manpbearpig.  But it looks like more and more scientists are debunking that and now at least 31,000 signatures are being put on a petition denouncing the theory of  Manbearpig. But do not tell AlGore his Royal "pain in the ass Prince Albert in a can" Charles about this because the Goracle wants the next genereation to be one of those great generations of heros that will save the Earth from the Burning Ring of Fire, and Prince Chuckie says we got 18 months to live.

Cross posted at Grizzly Groundswell and Fort Hard Knox

H/T to Hoosier Army Mom

Bet you won’t see this on CNN tonight!  The Mainstream Media chooses what they want you to know, and it will be no different on this. 

From:  The National Press Club Online

10:00 AM  OISM (News Conference)
Description: MEDIA ADVISORY: Dr. Arthur Robinson (OISM) to release names of over 30,000 scientists rejecting global warming hypothesis.Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (OISM)

Who: Dr. Arthur Robinson of the OISM

What: release of names in OISM “Petition Project”

When: 10:00am on Monday May 19

Where: Holeman Lounge at the National Press Club, 529 14th St., NW, Washington, DC

Why: the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (OISM) will announce that more than 31,000 scientists have signed a petition rejecting claims of human-caused global warming. The purpose of OISM’s Petition Project is to demonstrate that the claim of “settled science” and an overwhelming “consensus” in favor of the hypothesis of human-caused global warming and consequent climate damage is wrong. No such consensus or settled science exists. As indicated by the petition text and signatory list, a very large number of American scientists reject this hypothesis.

It is evident that 31,072 Americans with university degrees in science — including 9,021 PhDs, are not “a few.” Moreover, from the clear and strong petition statement that they have signed, it is evident that these 31,072 American scientists are not “skeptics.”

Following the Press Club event, Dr. Robinson will host a lunch briefing on the Hill. Interested parties may join him in the Environment and Public Works hearing room, 406 Dirksen at noon for lunch on Monday May 19.

Please indicate whether you will attend the lunch by emailing audrey@advocacyink.com with your contact info and affiliation.

Sponsored by:Oregon Institute of Science & Medicine

Also posting :

The American Thinker

May 05, 2008

IS AlGore shivering in his boots???

Manbearpig7po Cross posted at Grizzly Groundwell

It is pretty sad when the disciples of the New Church of Manbearig go to this kind of extreme to fool the public.   Now the cooling period that is natural is going to slow down Manbearpig for a little bit, but he will come back stronger after his slumber.   On its face this is just ridiculous, if natural climate change can slow down Manbearpig, how can we even believe there is a Manbearpig out there. I thought that Manbearpig was unstoppable and we need to find him before the Earth is a "Burning Ring of Fire".  But I guess the inconvenient truth is that the Goracle made Manbearpig up to make money and to help his friends get grant money to look for Manbearpig.   

See, the climate of the Earth can not be changed by a mythical creature such and Manberapig.   It has more to do with the cycles of the Sun, the Oceans and the orbit of the Earth.  And there are many other factors that the models the Climate hysterics can never ever put into a computer model.   CO2 the big bad gas is only abut .002% of Global Warming.   And all the treaties and regulations will never change the cycles that the Climate goes through.  An just follow the money that goes to all the acolytes of AlGore.  If there was not a catastrophy around the corner, how would these "scientists" live.  They are not "scientists" or "climate experts", they are politicians.

Today on American Thinker, Marc Sheppard has a great post about the silliness of the Global Warming alarmists reaction to the cooling that the Earth is going through right now.


Are Global Warmists Pulling a Cool Fast One?

By Marc Sheppard

Mounting evidence of lower temperature trends despite rising atmospheric CO2 levels is becoming a real problem for the greenhouse gas crowd.  And reports that the cooling appears to follow a period of dormant solar activity aren't likely to ease their anxieties.

Indeed, without an immediate alarmist course correction, years of "the science is settled" campaigning could prove for naught, as prolonged temperature dips decimate the primary anthropogenic argument.  After all, Lord Gore has shouted the IPCC's proclamation of a 0.3°C warming over the next decade from virtually every rooftop.  Given new data projecting the contrary, he and his green hordes will need to find a way to not only explain the error, but keep the AGW dream alive.

And perhaps they have.

On April 21st, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory confirmed that an impending phase shift in a natural climate event would likely bring colder temperatures for as many as the next 20-30 years, noting that:

"The shift in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, with its widespread Pacific Ocean temperature changes, will have significant implications for global climate. It can affect Pacific and Atlantic hurricane activity, droughts and flooding around the Pacific basin, marine ecosystems and global land temperature patterns."

Well aware of the impact the news might have on the green-deity IPCC's warming predictions, the JPL was quick to add that "Sea level rise and global warming due to increases in greenhouse gases can be strongly affected by large natural climate phenomenon such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and the El Nino-Southern Oscillation."  JPL oceanographer and climate scientist Josh Willis explained:

"The comings and goings of El Niño, La Niña and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation are part of a longer, ongoing change in global climate. In fact, these natural climate phenomena can sometimes hide global warming caused by human activities. Or they can have the opposite effect of accentuating it."

Just 10 days later, the results of a model study on another phenomenon, this time affecting the North Atlantic, were published in the journal Nature [PDF]. Dr Noel Keenlyside et al, of the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences in Germany, reported that the "conveyor belt" of southern warm water known as the Meridional Overturning Circulation is entering a weak cycle.  As weak MOC cycles -- which can last as many as 80 years -- are associated with cooler North Atlantic temperatures, particularly around Europe and North America, the team expects global surface temperatures to decrease over the next decade.  Oddly, a similar pattern between the 1940s and 1970s may explain the cooling of global average temperatures during that period, so assuming only the "next decade" seems an arbitrary call.

Nonetheless, the German scientists felt compelled to explain their evident heresy against the church of the IPCC:

"Our results suggest that global surface temperature may not increase over the next decade, as natural climate variations in the North Atlantic and tropical Pacific temporarily offset the projected anthropogenic warming."

In case "temporarily offset" proved too vague to the green brigade, Keenlyside clarified when explaining to Bloomberg News:

"If we don't experience warming over the next 10 years, it doesn't mean that greenhouse-gas warming is not with us. There can be natural fluctuations that may mask climate change in the short term.''

And for the benefit of those still concerned, his associate Mojib Latif, a professor at the Leibniz Institute, spelled it out in no uncertain terms:

"Just to make things clear, we are not stating that anthropogenic climate change won't be as bad as previously thought."

It certainly appeared to be merely a typical cover your green ass move

The Very Model of a Modern Solar Minimum

According to UK's Telegraph the report stemmed from "initial findings from a new computer model of how the oceans behave over decades," and readers were reminded that:

"The IPCC currently does not include in its models actual records of such events as the strength of the Gulf Stream and the El Nino cyclical warming event in the Pacific, which are known to have been behind the warmest year ever recorded in 1998."

Of course, solar activity is also essentially ignored by IPCC models, and it too saw an apex in 1998.  Isn't it interesting how, not unlike insects scampering from light exposed by a stone overturned, greenies struggle desperately to avoid directly confronting the power of the Sun?

Last year, Britain's Hadley Centre, whose decadal models actually do incorporate sea surface temperatures as well as projected changes in the Sun's output and the effects of previous volcanic eruptions, predicted that global warming would slow until 2009 and pick up after that, with half the years after 2009 being warmer than the warmest year on record, 1998." Still, they stood solidly behind the IPCC by predicting that "Over the 10-year period as a whole, climate continues to warm and 2014 is likely to be 0.3 deg C warmer than 2004."

Then, this past January, the Centre predicted 2008 would be the coolest since 2000, this time based upon the "strong La Niña in the tropical Pacific Ocean" exclusively. Mysteriously, they completely ignored recent news at the time that solar activity had all but come to a stop -- a factor supposedly included in their modeling.

But last week, rather than disputing the Leibniz Institute oceans-behavior-only model that suggests not only Hadley, but the IPCC itself erred, the Centre's Richard Wood stated:

"We've always known that the climate varies naturally from year to year and decade to decade.  We expect man-made global warming to be superimposed on those natural variations; and this kind of research is important to make sure we don't get distracted from the longer term changes that will happen in the climate (as a result of greenhouse gas emissions)."

Seemingly taking a bullet for the green team, Wood ‘fessed up to last year's bad prediction when he told reporters that "natural climate variations could be stronger than the global-warming trend over the next 10-year period."

Pretty slick -- by jumping aboard the new model's bandwagon, Wood managed to again ignore the Solar factor (Cycle 24 is delayed) while extending the bogus it's-part-nature-but-mostly-mankind safety-net his group's models had strung by almost 10 years. 

On the other hand, in addition to casting great doubt upon his own group's models, Wood's admission bolstered the doubt that Leibniz's would already cast upon those of the IPCC.  And Wood notwithstanding, as Dr. Roger Pelke Jr. pointed out in his April 30th Prometheus post after reviewing the Nature piece:

"If global cooling over the next few decades is consistent with model predictions, then so too is pretty much anything and everything under the sun. This means that from a practical standpoint climate models are of no practical use beyond providing some intellectual authority in the promotional battle over global climate policy."

Obviously, capitulating now meant accepting the risk of jeopardizing whatever credibility all previous and future climate models may hold.  Bad move -- or chess move?

Does Anybody Really Know What Climate Is?
 
Prior to its official release, Keenlyside expressed concerns that his report might be taken the "wrong way."  The good doctor even attempted to trivialize dissenters by invoking the name of a favorite eco-boogieman when he lamely lamented "I hope it doesn't become a message of Exxon Mobil and other skeptics."  And just in case his and his colleagues' tepid reaffirmations of their AGW pledges fell short of the green mark, reinforcements were immediately dispatched.

Not surprisingly, the alarmist shills at the BBC wrote that the up and down projections "did not come as a surprise to climate scientists."  No, according to these insufferables, only the ill-informed public ever believed that "the rapid temperature rises seen through the 1990s are a permanent phenomenon."   

The New York Times rolled out Kevin Trenberth, a climate scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, in Boulder, CO. Tremberth told them that "the global climate will continue to be influenced in any particular decade by a mix of natural variability and the building greenhouse effect" and that "a cool phase does not mean the overall theory of dangerous human-driven warming is flawed."

And then added what appears to be the latest greenie talking point:

"Too many think global warming means monotonic relentless warming everywhere year after year. It does not happen that way."

Is anyone else noticing a trend developing here, beyond the "we never said that warming patterns would be steady" shuffle?  Each explanation, whether by Willis, Keenlyside and Latif, Wood, or Trenberth implies that some climate forces natural are more formidable than those anthropogenic. This is yet another precarious admission, indeed - one unlikely to be made were the alternative not somehow more damaging to their cause.

Now consider this --  it remains an alarmist imperative to disassociate falling global temperatures and speculation of a possible impending "little ice age" with the yellow dwarf star we orbit in general and the late start of Solar Cycle 24 specifically.  For indeed, if we are moving into another solar minimum cycle and global temperatures continue to plummet while atmospheric CO2 levels continue to rise, attendance at Al Gore's Scare-Story-Slide-Shows would quickly drop to close friends and family only.  And with boat loads of very bad wealth-redistribution "climate change" legislation to pass in coming the years, a sympathetically alarmed press and populace remain essential during that time.

So what better way to buy time than to cloud the obvious solar connection by sacrificing their argument against a less threatening naturally occurring force?  And then attributing that force to occasional periods of cooling by collectively admitting to its mitigating impact upon AGW forces?   Especially when this little gambit allows them to continue reaping the benefits - for years to come - of the lie that an unchecked anthropogenic greenhouse gas effect threatens to literally destroy us all.

Just not quite as fast as they originally thought.

So then, are the greenies simply playing defense, as they have led many to believe - or is it we who are being played?

Marc Sheppard is a frequent contributor to American Thinker and welcomes your feedback.

April 29, 2008

McCain on the lookout for Manbearpig now

It looks like John McCain has drank the Gracles cool-aide. He has fallen for the bamboozling Mnabearpig  myth.  Raymond S. Kraft hasan Open Letter to McCain to nnot fall for the Goracle's false prophet Manbearpig.

H/T to Right Truth

Manbearpig

Global Warming? An Open Letter to John McCain

Raymond S. Kraft


Dear Mr. McCain

It seems that some leading Republicans such as yourself, Newt Gingrich, and even President Bush, have accepted the premise of Anthropogenic Global Warming – that man is spewing millions of tons of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere each year, and that this is causing an unprecedented rise in earth's temperature that threatens us all. And, if we spend enough money to reduce CO2 emissions, we can change it.

I urge you to reconsider. More than 19,000 scientists have signed the Global Warming Petition to protest the

Kyoto

accord, and declare their opposition to the theory that man's CO2 emissions are causing Global Warming (the Global Warming Petition at http://www.oism.org/pproject/). Written and sponsored by Dr. Frederick Seitz, past president of the National Academy of Sciences, the Petition reads:

Global Warming Petition

"We urge the

United States

government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in

Kyoto

,

Japan

, in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases, is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of Earth's climate. Morever, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide [willl] produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth."

There is certainly no "consensus."  The IPCC Report on Global Warming (2007) from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change states that it was "reviewed" by 600 authors from 40 countries, and over 620 experts and governments. The 19,000 scientists who have signed the Global Warming Petition outnumber those who have "reviewed" the IPCC report by more than 15 to 1.

The illustrations below are from www.GlobalWarmingArt.com, a website created to graphically illustrate the evidence for Global Warming Theory, and since they were created by proponents of Global Warming Theory, I will adopt them, and stipulate to their accuracy, and explain very simply why this evidence produced by the Global Warming proponents proves them wrong.

The Global Warming theorists always point to rises in temperature (by fractions of a degree) within the last 200 years, or the last 1,000 years, but such a small sample of climate history is not historically representative, and is not a large enough data set to be scientifically meaningful. It's cherry-picking the evidence. To be intellectually honest, we must look at all the evidence we have, not just a small fraction of it. To be scientifically meaningful, we must look to the long history of climate changes, as shown in the six illustrations below.---Family Security Matters

April 22, 2008

Get your long underwear out

Manbearpig might be going extinct.  We  may be heading for another Ice Age or at least another cooling period in the Eath's Climate.  See, the Climate of theEarth coincides with the amount of SunSpots on that big Orange thing in the sky. Sun Spots have an impact on the temperature of the Earth more than all the CO2 we could produce.  We know this because the temperature on Mars, Venus and all the other planets in our Solar System have warmed at the same rate as the Earth has. And what is in common with all of these planets, The Sun.  So it is a pretty well known fact that the Sun affects the Climate here on Earth and on our sister planets.  But now there is a disturbng trend in the cycle of the Sun.  There are no Sun Spots, and that corresponds to cooler temperatures. And could lead to another Ice Age. Forget all of what the Global Warming fanatics tell you, a cooler Earth is more dangerous to hunankind than a warmer Earth.  Without the warmth the Sun, plants do not grow in the Temperate regions of the Earth. Just ask France about that, starvation and failed crops lead to the French Revolution.   

This is not a post to scare you into thinking the Ice Age is right around the corner. If indeed we are going into a Ice Age, it will take a long time for the Ice to cover the continents.  But as happened in the Little Ice Age, we could be in for harsher winters and more Glacial Ice. And this is not to say also that this is absolutely going to happen either.  The earth's Climate is almost impossible to predict to the nth degree, but we have not had any kind of warming in the past decade and 2007 had the most dramatic drop in temperatures ever. So we could be in the down trend of temperature for awhile.   So I wouldn't get my swimsuit out for Siberia for a while.

And HappyAggravation Day to you all in LA.

Cross Posted at Grizzly Groundswell and Fort Hard Knox

H/T to Ace of Spades

Manbearpig Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh

THE scariest photo I have seen on the internet is www.spaceweather.com, where you will find a real-time image of the sun from the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, located in deep space at the equilibrium point between solar and terrestrial gravity.

What is scary about the picture is that there is only one tiny sunspot.

Disconcerting as it may be to true believers in global warming, the average temperature on Earth has remained steady or slowly declined during the past decade, despite the continued increase in the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide, and now the global temperature is falling precipitously.

All four agencies that track Earth's temperature (the Hadley Climate Research Unit in Britain, the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, the Christy group at the University of Alabama, and Remote Sensing Systems Inc in California) report that it cooled by about 0.7C in 2007. This is the fastest temperature change in the instrumental record and it puts us back where we were in 1930. If the temperature does not soon recover, we will have to conclude that global warming is over.

There is also plenty of anecdotal evidence that 2007 was exceptionally cold. It snowed in Baghdad for the first time in centuries, the winter in China was simply terrible and the extent of Antarctic sea ice in the austral winter was the greatest on record since James Cook discovered the place in 1770.

It is generally not possible to draw conclusions about climatic trends from events in a single year, so I would normally dismiss this cold snap as transient, pending what happens in the next few years.

This is where SOHO comes in. The sunspot number follows a cycle of somewhat variable length, averaging 11 years. The most recent minimum was in March last year. The new cycle, No.24, was supposed to start soon after that, with a gradual build-up in sunspot numbers.

It didn't happen. The first sunspot appeared in January this year and lasted only two days. A tiny spot appeared last Monday but vanished within 24 hours. Another little spot appeared this Monday. Pray that there will be many more, and soon.

The reason this matters is that there is a close correlation between variations in the sunspot cycle and Earth's climate. The previous time a cycle was delayed like this was in the Dalton Minimum, an especially cold period that lasted several decades from 1790.

Northern winters became ferocious: in particular, the rout of Napoleon's Grand Army during the retreat from Moscow in 1812 was at least partly due to the lack of sunspots.

That the rapid temperature decline in 2007 coincided with the failure of cycle No.24 to begin on schedule is not proof of a causal connection but it is cause for concern.

It is time to put aside the global warming dogma, at least to begin contingency planning about what to do if we are moving into another little ice age, similar to the one that lasted from 1100 to 1850.

There is no doubt that the next little ice age would be much worse than the previous one and much more harmful than anything warming may do. There are many more people now and we have become dependent on a few temperate agricultural areas, especially in the US and Canada. Global warming would increase agricultural output, but global cooling will decrease it. ---The Australian

April 07, 2008

More chinks in the theory of Manbearpig

Read the report here (pdf)



HT to Right Truth

More trouble on the Manbearpig Front

Some more kinks in the Theoryof Manbearpig.  Today in The American Tinker, Jon Caruthers has a great post about the follies of man trying to tame Mother Nature.

Vanities of the Warmists

By Jon Caruthers

The conceit that scientists and bureaucrats can use the power the state to manage nature has lead to disaster in the past, and will again if the global warmists keep getting their way.
When Yellowstone National Park was first created, park officials believed they had to “save” the native fauna as well as protect the visitors by killing off the native wolf population.  This they did in grand form.  Additionally, they noticed the yearly occurrences of wildfires which, according to the then “modern” and “progressive” thought of the day, should be stamped out at all cost. 
The net result of these notions was that 110 years or so later half the park burned down.  It turns out that without the wolves the ruminants ran wild and ate up the deciduous trees, leaving only the pine trees to go forth and multiply.  Anyone who’s started a campfire knows what happens when you compound this with 110 years of pine needles and flotsam and jetsam -- you end up with the perfect firestorm.  This is nothing natural.  This situation was created by us -- by human intervention into a formerly pristine ecosystem that was supposedly “managed” by the federal government – and the result was that half the park burned down.
Once again, on the issue of “global warming” we’re faced with government control -- in this case not of the national park system, but of the entire globe.  The “progressives” and their “grand thoughts” of the age seek to “manage” the globe in the same “modern” way  our ancestors “managed” Yellowstone.  Like our ancestors of yore, today’s environmentalists believe the government can control the environment better than Mother Nature can.  Are we to suppose that the people who give us the DMV and the IRS are going to “manage” the globe in the same efficient and benevolent manner?  In the grand scheme of things are we supposed to believe that we humans are actually better than Mother Nature at “managing” the global environment?  For some reason, the enviro-nazis of the age seem to believe that Mother Nature is some kind of octogenarian Alzheimer’s patient and they’re the designated colostomy bag.

Take the great debate over the “Atlantic Conveyor Belt” e.g. the Gulf Stream.  Recent studies have shown that glacial melting from Greenland has created a massive pool of freshwater over the Gulf Stream that has disturbed the salinity of the Atlantic Ocean and is shutting down the Gulf Stream.  Oh no, this must be a horrible event with calamitous consequences, right?  According to the Ecopalyptics, if the Gulf Stream is shut down, Europe won’t receive its relatively warm currents that mean the difference between Shropshire and Winnepeg -- which are roughly on the same latitude.  As a result, Europe would be thrown into a new Ice Age, right?  Actually no.  It’s all about negative feedback.  The earth is a stable system, if it weren’t life would have disappeared billions of years ago.  It’s the negative feedback that makes life possible in the first place -- if things get out of whack, there’s a system for getting them back to normality.  If the Gulf Stream fades, Arctic winds will sink south and cover Greenland, thereby cooling the island and stopping the glacial melt -- thus stopping the runaway insanity of the eco-warriors’ worst nightmares.----The American Thinker

April 01, 2008

Goracle to spend $300 million to find Manbearpig

Yes, the Goracleis going on a spending spreee to get the message out about Manbearpig.  If you have any information,please call the Goracle or you local Church of Manbearpig, because the Goracle is cereal.

Manbearpig_2

Gore Announces 3-Year 'We' Campaign to Combat Global Warming

Monday, March 31, 2008

NASHVILLE, Tenn. —  Former Vice President Al Gore on Monday launched a three-year, multimillion-dollar advocacy campaign calling for the U.S. to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions.

The Alliance for Climate Protection's campaign, dubbed "we," will combine advertising, online organizing and partnerships with grassroots groups to educate the public about global warming and urge solutions from elected officials.

"We're trying to get a movement happening to switch public opinion so that our leaders feel, 'Wow! We really need to make this a top priority issue,"' Alliance CEO Cathy Zoi told The Associated Press.

An advertising campaign will equate the climate-change movement with other grand historic endeavors, like stopping fascism in Europe during World War II, overcoming segregation in the United States and putting the first man on the moon.

Some advertisements will feature bipartisan pairs, such as the Rev. Al Sharpton with Pat Robertson and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi with former Speaker Newt Gingrich, Zoi said.

The Alliance will initially spend $300 million over three years, although Zoi said more could be spent in the future.---FoxNews

March 12, 2008

CEI's new ad against the myth of the Goracle

H/T to Moonbattery

Manbearpig ALGore and his search for Manberpig is still going.

March 11, 2008

More holes in the Theory of Manbearpig

A former Manbearpig supporter has changed his mind because the scinetific equations had Manbearpig all wrong. 

Manbearpig

Researcher: Basic Greenhouse Equations "Totally Wrong"
Michael Asher (Blog) - March 6, 2008 11:02 AM

New derivation of equations governing the greenhouse effect reveals "runaway warming" impossible.

Miklós Zágoni isn't just a physicist and environmental researcher.  He is also a global warming activist and Hungary's most outspoken supporter of the Kyoto Protocol. Or was.

That was until he learned the details of a new theory of the greenhouse effect, one that not only gave far more accurate climate predictions here on Earth, but Mars too. The theory was developed by another Hungarian scientist, Ferenc Miskolczi, an atmospheric physicist with 30 years of experience and a former researcher with NASA's Langley Research Center.

After studying it, Zágoni stopped calling global warming a crisis, and has instead focused on presenting the new theory to other climatologists. The data fit extremely well.  "I fell in love," he stated at the International Climate Change Conference this week.

"Runaway greenhouse theories contradict energy balance equations," Miskolczi states.  Just as the theory of relativity sets an upper limit on velocity, his theory sets an upper limit on the greenhouse effect, a limit which prevents it from warming the Earth more than a certain amount.

How did modern researchers make such a mistake? They relied upon equations derived over 80 years ago, equations which left off one term from the final solution.

Miskolczi's story reads like a book. Looking at a series of differential equations for the greenhouse effect, he noticed the solution -- originally done in 1922 by Arthur Milne, but still used by climate researchers today -- ignored boundary conditions by assuming an "infinitely thick" atmosphere. Similar assumptions are common when solving differential equations; they simplify the calculations and often result in a result that still very closely matches reality. But not always.

So Miskolczi re-derived the solution, this time using the proper boundary conditions for an atmosphere that is not infinite. His result included a new term, which acts as a negative feedback to counter the positive forcing. At low levels, the new term means a small difference ... but as greenhouse gases rise, the negative feedback predominates, forcing values back down.

NASA refused to release the results.  Miskolczi believes their motivation is simple.  "Money", he tells DailyTech.  Research that contradicts the view of an impending crisis jeopardizes funding, not only for his own atmosphere-monitoring project, but all climate-change research.  Currently, funding for climate research tops $5 billion per year.
---Daily Tech

March 06, 2008

In Case You Missed It

I know that there is no where in the MSM you saw this, so the good people at American Thinker gave a rundown on what went down.  Yes, there was a conference with those evil "Manbearpig Skeptics".  There was a bunch of evil people that get money from ecil oil companies and people that want you to drink pollution and breathe in pollution.    Oh no, it was just a bunch of scientists, economists and policy wonks that have not drunk the cool-aid from the New Church of Manbearpig.

Cross posted at Grizzly Groundswell